This is a demo.
The two leagues below are invented and so are the projections behind them — no real league, manager or team name appears on this page.
Everything else is genuine output: the season simulation, the playoff odds, the charts and the positional breakdown were all produced by the extension itself, and this file is exactly what its
Save as HTML button writes. Click a league row, then click any blue position, to explore it.
What is QuickManager?
QuickManager — Power Rankings
Saved
9/6/2026, 4:42:02 PM
Week
10
Leagues
2
Calibrated σ
Off — structural σ from league settings
Depth / fragility
On — availability risk simulated
Interactive snapshot. Click any league row to view the detailed simulation distributions and positional breakdowns.
Where your attention is worth the most
Click a column to sort. High week swing = a waiver claim or lineup fix here changes something. Low swing = you're locked in or already out, so spend the time elsewhere. Click a league to view that roster.
League
Playoffs
Bye
Status
Week swing ▼
Fragility
Weakest slot
Sunday Scaries Superflexdetail
61%
20%
CONTENDER
+30%
−1
RB (-3.9)
Waiver Wire Wednesdaydetail
80%
—
CONTENDER
+29%
−0
K (-0.9)
Sunday Scaries Superflex
CONTENDER61% sim playoff rate20% first-round byeiLive and worth real attention — waivers and trades matter here.
Depth-adjusted:61%RESILIENT (−1 pts)Holds up well even when someone misses time.
Win this week → 85% · Lose → 55%(swings +30.0%).
Lineup is already worth ~all it can be this week.
Weakest slot: RB at 10.1 pts/wk vs a league median of 13.9. An upgrade there is worth about 3.9 pts/wk.
Most concentrated at QB — losing your best one costs 15.3 pts/wk. That's where depth would help most.
1.The Bowers That Be (sam_h)
6-39.0-5.087%
2.Hurts So Good (tayl0r)
5-48.4-5.677%
3.Purdy Good Team (olu_a)
5-47.4-6.662%
4.Chase Manhattan (demo_manager) (you)
6-38.2-5.861%
5.Nacua Matata (devin_t)
6-37.7-6.357%
6.Collins Calling (priya.k)
5-47.5-6.549%
7.Gibbs Me A Break (marcus.w)
5-47.1-6.944%
8.Hall of Shame (bex)
5-47.1-6.938%
9.Bijan Mustard (mikez)
4-57.0-7.037%
10.Nix Please (jordan_p)
4-56.9-7.135%
11.Saquon Barklily (nate99)
5-47.3-6.734%
12.Kittle Caesars (rachael.q)
4-56.5-7.518%
Weeks 10–14 simulated assuming BOTH teams start their best lineup, top 6 make playoffs. Projected records are expected wins (a 55% game counts as 0.55, not a win) and further-out weeks are weighted closer to a coin flip, since projections that far ahead can't know about injuries or trades yet.
Remaining schedule: 4.5 pts/week harder than league average.
σ ≈ 35.0 pts — derived from this league's own scoring rules and lineup shape (TD-heavy and superflex formats are noisier; PPR is calmer). Tick "Calibrate from past results" to measure it from real completed weeks instead.
Waiver Wire Wednesday
CONTENDER80% sim playoff rateiLive and worth real attention — waivers and trades matter here.
Depth-adjusted:79%RESILIENT (−0 pts)Holds up well even when someone misses time.
Win this week → 90% · Lose → 61%(swings +29.5%).
Lineup is already worth ~all it can be this week.
Most concentrated at K — losing your best one costs 7.0 pts/wk. That's where depth would help most.
1.Two Minute Warning (demo_manager) (you)
6-38.6-5.480%
2.Kupp Of Joe (darius)
6-38.6-5.477%
3.Pass The Aux (reggie)
5-47.6-6.465%
4.Bench Warmers Union (ty_b)
5-47.6-6.459%
5.Third And Long Island (sofia.m)
4-56.9-7.150%
6.Puka Yourself (anand)
5-47.4-6.642%
7.Flexual Healing (quinn_d)
4-56.2-7.815%
8.Two Tight Ends (jessie.r)
3-65.4-8.65%
9.Scary Terry Cloth (leah.v)
3-65.1-8.94%
10.Mixon It Up (hana_l)
3-65.6-8.44%
Weeks 10–14 simulated assuming BOTH teams start their best lineup, top 4 make playoffs. Projected records are expected wins (a 55% game counts as 0.55, not a win) and further-out weeks are weighted closer to a coin flip, since projections that far ahead can't know about injuries or trades yet.
Remaining schedule: about league average.
σ ≈ 35.0 pts — derived from this league's own scoring rules and lineup shape (TD-heavy and superflex formats are noisier; PPR is calmer). Tick "Calibrate from past results" to measure it from real completed weeks instead.